Home   •   What is FactLogic?   •   How to Use FactLogic   •   About Us   •   Administrator's Login   •   Contact Us

 

Investigation

Solve your case.


Public cases are used by the media, organizations, classes, groups, etc:

·         Media. If you are in the media, you can use FactLogic to involve your audience at a level never before available. FactLogic helps you keep your audience involved and loyal – and that means higher ratings.

·         Organizations, Classes, and Groups. Use FactLogic to see how your group evaluates a case (e.g., as a mock jury). 

You can use FactLogic to evaluate and compare assertions from forensic science , security, geology, astronomy, archeology, paleontology, evolutionary biology, etc. For the purpose of investigation, a case consists of one or more independent facts and one or more assertions. (Two facts are independent if knowing that one fact exists does not change your judgment of the other fact.) An assertion is a statement to be proved - such as an allegation, charge, cause of action, hypothesis, etc. Independent facts are judged to evaluate assertions.  Assertions are evaluated as the probability it is true. FactLogic provides the logical evaluation of an assertion. If there are multiple assertions, compare them by comparing the probability that each is true.

You can easily create your case and evaluate it.

·         Create Your Case.  Enter some case information, one or more assertions, and the independent facts.

·         Evaluate Your Case. You, and those who are aware that the case is posted on the Web, can immediately evaluate your case. Evaluators can be collocated or dispersed.  Factlogic combines multiple evaluations and provides the statistical conclusions.

1. Evaluation

Since a public case involves multiple evaluators, conclusions are especially trustworthy and accurate. Evaluators can be collocated or dispersed.

·         Obtain Multiple Evaluators. The more evaluators, the more precise will be the estimate. Since this is a public case, you can reach evaluators in a number of ways such as the media, announcement, advertisement, flyer, e-mail, etc. You have chosen the population of evaluators. They are selected randomly from that population since they chose to respond.

·        Obtain Independent Evaluations. Evaluators should judge the facts independently (i.e., without communication). Communication introduces bias, but it is not an issue if evaluators are dispersed.

2. Analysis

 

Statistical analysis is appropriate for investigations because evaluators need to know how accurately they have estimated the probability an assertion is true, and they sometimes need to compare the probabilities that multiple assertions are true. FactLogic computes the average probability the assertion is true (from the participating evaluators), and it computes an interval, that is centered on the average, that you can be 95% confident contains the average probability the assertion is true (from the population).


Summary

For public cases, multiple evaluators use FactLogic to judge facts. In this case, evaluations are precise and unusually trustworthy.



Return to previous page Go to top of page Go to glossary
[Arrest and Warrant] [Evidence] [Independence]

© Convex Corporation 1999
- 2005